On Monday night the Stop The War Coalition (STWC) held a public meeting at the House of Commons - Syria: the case against military intervention.
Diane Abbott MP was the Chair. There were the usual suspects as speakers plus Tory MP Crispin Blunt, whose Foreign Affairs Select Committee had just delivered a report against any British involvement in Syria. Plus Alex Salmond and Caroline Lucas. Conspicuous by their absence as speakers were Syrians, the STWC refused to give any a platform.
Salmond's SNP did give a Syrian a platform, Dr Amer Masri,
on stage at their recent conference (many in the audience wept). Praising this, the Syria Solidarity Movement (SSM) noted the STWC refusal this last Monday
and that:
Nor were any Syrians invited to speak at Stop the War’s meeting on Syria for the Labour Conference fringe in Brighton; nor were any Syrians invited to speak at Stop the War’s meeting on Syria in Manchester. When Syrian civil society activists wanted to speak at a Stop the War meeting on Syria in London in September, they were told it was “not appropriate”.
SSM were also blocked from speaking at an April solidarity with refugees march - by STWC. This
led to an apology from the march's organisers!
Last month Birmingham STWC dared to invite a speaker from SSM but were
forced to withdraw the invitation and were told SSM 'backs imperialists'.
When SSM leafleted a "overwhelmingly white and middle aged" STWC conference in June
they were insulted, and called in language which would make Kremlin propagandists proud "the pro-ISIS lot".
Yet they do not have an issue with
some Syrians. In 2012 STWC
platformed a Baathist and in 2013 the
controversial nun Mother Agnes - which backfired when no one would sit on the same platform as her.
On Monday at the House of Commons, says Peter Tatchell:
Some Syrian victims of Assad's brutalities turned up anyway but were not allowed to speak. They eventually shouted out in frustration, turning the meeting into momentary chaos, as they were jeered by some of the audience and as STWC stewards tried to eject them - allegedly threatening that they'd be arrested. The police turned up soon afterwards.
Order was eventually restored.
When it came to questions from the floor, other members of the audience were asked to speak but not the Syrians.
Near the end of the meeting, I personally appealed to Diane Abbott to let the Syrians have their say but she refused and closed the meeting.
Said Omar Sabbour:
 |
| Delores Umbridge |
To wind down the clock to stop Syrians speaking, Abbot literally allowed
a history lesson by an old man (who said the Arab spring..was a fiction) to drone on, the license given him was so long (initially
before panel was challenged only quickfire Qs were allowed) that even the crowd started to scorn, whilst Abbot sat listening with her head resting on her hand with her Umbridge-like smile.
(Dolores Umbridge is a Hogwarts villain in the guise of a respectable middle-class English lady).
Sabbour claimed that STWC had called police, that STWC stewards had threatened him with arrest and that 'emotional' Syrians and other Arabs told STWC "you have become our oppressors." The raucousness of the meeting was live Tweeted by
the BBC's Ross Hawkins.
Amr Salahi, an activist from the SSM,
told James Bloodworth, Editor of Left Foot Forward:
Clara Connolly, an immigration lawyer and activist with Syria Solidarity UK, later told the STWC they were silent about Assad’s crimes but they didn’t care. I told the speakers they just wanted Assad to keep killing people. Clara kept trying to make the point to the speakers that they had nothing to say about what was happening on the ground. All she got in return was silence. Then some of the organisers went up to her and warned her that if she didn’t be quiet, she would be forced to leave.
Says Tatchell:
I was shocked, surprised and saddened by Diane Abbott's unwillingness to invite Assad's victims to express their opinions. Not listening to victims of Assad’s war crimes is arrogant, insensitive and appalling. It has a whiff of ‘we know best’ and Syrian opinions ‘don’t count’.
You think?
Salahi said:
Syrians are not allowed to have an opinion about their own country. Only Westerners are allowed to talk about Syria.
Video emerged on the Thursday of what happened at the event, see it after the jump.
Yet in an increasingly angry back-and-forth on Twitter with Tatchell later on Monday evening STWC's Lindsey German
flat out denied that any of these events had happened, calling the Syrians 'wreckers'. She
even called the no-platforming of Syrians a, quote, "lie"!
The
news from the meeting was the BBC saying that Labour Foreign Affairs Shadow Minister Catherine West (a speaker at the meeting) had promised to consult STWC on Syria policy, later headlined as Labour giving STWC a "veto". This was untrue, she had been addressing Syrians in the room, as confirmed later by Syrians present and by her in a statement.
But it was highly noteworthy that as she addressed this the Labour PR team directly undermined her
by saying that, yes, they would consult outside the party, specifically naming STWC. Labour PR is now run by Seumas Milne, a prominent ally of STWC working for a party leader who used to chair the group.
West was later reported to have spoken to Syrians before the meeting and to have expressed great concern to them that they be consulted by the Labour Party, which she
confirmed in a tweet - She clarifies she wants to consult Syrians then Labour PR (Milne) clarifies will talk to STWC. What does that tell you?
Peter adds that it was 'ironic' that STWC would put Tory Crispin Blunt on their platform when Blunt has said "he would support military action in Syria in certain circumstances."
Andrew Coates
noted that Andrew Murray, another panelist and STWC Chair, is a leading member of the Communist Party (CPB) who "explicitly do support Russia "bombing" Daesh and backing Assad, explicitly!" Murray
reportedly said at the Monday meeting that "only sovereign forces from Syria + Iraq" can defeat ISIS.
(See
Andrew's post on Murray and STWC's 'confused' position on bombing.)
In a lengthy dialogue on Twitter the following day between myself and several others with a STWC treasurer,
Stephen Bell, when pushed on why they refused to put a Syrian on their platform he claimed that all the Syrian solidarity groups support bombing, which is not true, and that STWC were within their rights to not give a platform to anyone who 'supports bombing'.
To which SSM member Mark Boothroyd wryly
noted that:
if you haven't noticed Syria is still being bombed so your "victory" is meaningless for those actually affected.
The "victory" being claimed by Bell, of course, being news reports that Prime Minister David Cameron had delayed a vote on whether the UK would join in with bombing ISIS in Syria. This when Labour's Catherine West
had explicitly stated at the meeting that it was Russia's intervention which had made the prospect of the UK's intervention "more remote."
But Bell's emotive, deliberately simplistic and repetitive statement that STWC would not give an airing to anyone who 'supports bombing' was contradicted not only by the presence of Blunt and Murray but also by Lindsey German herself who in her Twitter exchange with Tatchell
said that STWC would not have "speakers who support intervention."
 |
| *Pic actually from German satire website |
What 'intervention' might mean is, of course, something which the Syrian 'Stop The War' movement, Syrian civil society and Syrian socialists have widely discussed. There are
a number of proposals, many of which, for blindingly obvious reasons, do not include 'bombing'.
Yet German could not have been more obvious in saying that STWC does not want to hear any of them and will, in fact, as long experience has shown, use their leading role to silence any Syrian who does not support Assad, whose crimes
STWC always cover up. Of course she won't listen to Syrians when STWC
continue to paint all opposition to Assad as Islamic fascists.
In a lengthy explainer - '
The Syrian Revolution and the crisis of the anti-war movement', do go read - Mark Boothroyd nails where the toxic politics which led to Monday's absurd scenes of so-called peace activists shouting down Syrian refugees comes from:
Too many leading figures in the British anti-war movement chose to view all these revolutions through their relation to the US/UK and its intentions. This approach erased the agency of the oppressed Syrian people engaged in struggle with the regime, and gave no responsibility to the role of imperialist powers like Russia in propping up the dictatorship. It served to obscure the complex reality of the multi-polar world system, split between competing imperialist powers, with no single dominant power overwhelmingly determining the course of events.
Instead of analysing the actual relationships of regional and global powers that were thrown into flux by the Arab Spring, the approach of the anti-war movement was shaped by a framework of Cold War power relations, massaged to fit leftist prejudices and domestic alliances developed during opposition to the “War on Terror” and Iraq War.
Syrian and pro-revolution Arab voices have been marginalised, while outright apologists for the Assad regime like George Galloway have been central to developing it and propagating the position of Stop the War.
Many, through social media, have this week witnessed the ugly true face of the so-called Stop The War Coalition in this rowdy silencing of Syrian voices.
It is to be hoped that this exposure does not get forgotten and that those drawn to them question harder how these people ever became leaders of the 'peace' movement. Already, Boothroyd notes, STWC inaction on supporting any solidarity with Syrians has alienated Muslims who have been engaged in humanitarian support.
However the news the following day was that another far-left project, 'Stand Up To Racism', which is a front for the Socialist Workers Party, has a 'Refugees welcome here' rally in London tonight.
Thirteenth on the bill of speakers is a - faceless, nameless - 'Syrian refugee'.
S/he's inclusion is surely welcomed but plainly an afterthought.
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
- Thanks for input from Peter Tatchell, Andrew Coates and Bob from Brockley.
Edited to add: I checked
the timeline of 'Stand Up To Racism' after the event and they did not mention the 'Syrian refugee speaker' once. Though I did establish that
the nameless refugee speaker was infact there, via, ironically, a SWP student tweet.
Edited to add: In an appearance on a BBC current affairs show on the Thursday Diane Abbott was confronted with a Syrian. Abbott denied she was a STWC member (she's a patron). Syrian refugee Muzna (
@SyriaUK) asked Abbott "are we not worthy until we drown on your shores?" See the exchange after the jump.
Edited to add: Caroline Lucas MP has
made the following claim: "I made the case several times during meeting that Syrians in audience should be heard, & raised with chair afterwards."
Omar Sabbour said: “She stopped her speech when interrupted because she wanted to ‘listen to the Syrians’ but she then did nothing when Diane Abbot afterwards refused to let any of the Arabs at the back to talk.”
Lucas
has responded to this claim saying "I repeatedly asked her [Abbott] to let Syrians speak, repeated it after meeting, & followed up with letter to [STWC]." That she asked for Syrians to be heard was confirmed by the SSM member who appeared alongside Abbott on the BBC. I have asked her to publish this letter to her website and will add once that happens.
Monday's events
were criticised by another leading member of the Green Party, Rupert Read who wrote: "Well done @PeterTatchell. Shame on 'Stop the war' (sic.) for repeatedly refusing to let Syrians speak on..Syria..!" (Tatchell is a member of the Green Party.) Read "strongly agreed" with Tatchell's comment that "Greens need to review their links with Stop The War. Not drop them but be more critical where needed."
Edited to add: On the Friday the Stop The War Coalition responded with
a bizarre post entitled 'Andrew Neil smears Stop the War', thus dismissing both the scrutiny from the left and Syrians and denying the facts as 'smears'. The documented dismissal of Syrian voices is called "organised disruption." They flat out lie that despite the video, despite the statement's of both Labour's Catherine West and the Greens Caroline Lucas, Syrians
were not prevented from speaking!
The several reports on the behaviour of the stewards, including their calling the police, is dismissed as a "lie". Whoever called them the police arrived, so there's a simple way to find out if it is infact a "lie" that STWC called them - ask the police. Should we do that STWC? Over to you ...
Of interest is the fact that the first person they rush to defend ("Lie one") is their Chair, Andrew Murray. This is because this post's information on Murray, supplied by Andrew Coates, was raised by Andrew Neil on the BBC in his questioning of Diane Abbott. Again, they flat out lie that Murray's Communist Party and hence Murray does not regard Assad as "legitimate" and supports the regime's war, aka 'bombing'.
In order to back their claim that they solely face "diehard opponents on the left" in their opposition to UK support for civilian protection (rather than, as I have already covered, Syrian civil society and Syrian socialists) they fall back on the presence of a Tory MP
Are they rattled? Time will tell but the post ends in a classic of 'projection' - the Soviet and now Kremlin tactic of claiming that others are doing what you're actually doing - "The lies of our opponents testify only to their desperation."
Edited to add: Omar Sabbour has published
a lengthy rebuttal to STWC's post. He notes that the meeting was filmed and that unedited footage will show who is right about both the STWC claims on Syrians being allowed to speak and on who called police. It will also show what was said from the platform and Sabbour in his rebuttal goes into detail on why STWC's arguments ("simply another form of Western narcissism and orientalism") are so wrong - do
go read.
Edited to add: On November 12 Syria Solidarity UK
published a rebuttal to STWC's post. They say that the fact that STWC "oppose any action against Assad ... puts Stop the War against Syrians who are being bombed by Assad." "This is why," they say, "Stop the War don’t want to listen to Syrians."
The group rebut the claims of three 'lies' by STWC, echoing Omar Sabbour.
Finally they criticise a piece by
Matt Carr, published by STWC, which claimed that unfair and lying criticism of STWC was coming not just from the right but also from the left. They point out that Carr claims that Assad was not responsible for chemical attacks and that there is little evidence that Assad is popular, let alone Carr's. Finally they say:
Syrian civilians need protection from Assad’s mass murder. Stop the War
have nothing to offer Syrians, and so they stop their ears.
See also:
Four days later and a prime vehicle for the spin by the Labour Party proclaimed the 'victory' of fascist Assad's forces in Aleppo.
Today we have a Stalinist Newspaper Corbyn professes to like, on its front page, saying that Aleppo has been 'liberated'. The same newspaper carries - highlights - a denunciation of Tatchell.
